( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||      ( )     ||     

| | || Western Scholar Supports zaidi imamate Position

: Western Scholar Supports zaidi imamate Position

Share |


: Western Scholar Supports zaidi imamate Position
: Zaida/ Madeling
: 04/01/2011
: 1595

Western scholar supports Zaidi Imamate Position:

Wilferd Madelung, a non-Muslim expert in Islamic history, in his book The Succession to Muhammad strongly refutes the arguments of the Sunnis that Muhammad (pbuh) was not to be succeeded by any of his family according to Gods design, and that Muhammad (pbuh) wished to leave the succession to be settled by the Muslim community on the basis of consultation (shura). He does this because of the overwhelming evidence he finds in the Quran that lineage from Prophets is a prerequisite for legitimate Islamic leadership. He writes in his Introduction:

The Quran accorded the Ahlul Bait of Muhammad an elevated position above the rest of the faithful, similar to the position of the families of the earlier prophets. It is evident that he could not have considered Abu Bakr his natural successor or have been pleased by his succession. He could not have seen his succession essentially other than in the light of the narrations of the Quran about the succession of the earlier prophets These earlier prophets considered it a supreme divine favor to be succeeded by their offspring or close kin, for which they implored their Lord. Even if the meaning of the term The Seal of the Prophets is accepted to be the last of the prophets, there is no reason it should imply that Muhammad , as the spiritual and worldly leader of the Muslim community, aside from his prophethood, should not be succeeded by his family. In the Quran, the descendants and close kin of the prophets are their heirs also in respect to kingship (mulk), rule (hukm), wisdom (hikma), the book and the imamate. The Quran advises the faithful to settle some matters by consultation, but not the succession to prophets. (pp 16-18)

After the introduction, his book goes on to describe the way the leadership was wrongfully handed over to the Prophets companions, in great detail, based upon the early source material. But, historical material is fairly subjective, and the best way to judge the historical events is by comparing them with the clear message of the Quran, as he has done very thoroughly in his introduction.

  The prophet Mohammed SAWW  

: 0


Powered by: mktba 4.7
| |